Attendance.
The following members of the Board of Supervisors were present: Walter
C. Zaremba, Donald E. Wiggins, James S. Burgett, and Thomas G. Shepperd.
Sheila S. Noll
was absent.
Also in
attendance were James O. McReynolds, County Administrator; and James E.
Barnett, County Attorney.
WORK SESSION
YORKTOWN
ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES
Mr. J. Mark Carter,
Assistant County Administrator, made a presentation on the Yorktown
Historic District and Design Guidelines and talked of previous
discussions and what led to the current effort. He reviewed the current
proposal which has been reviewed and redrafted by the Planning
Commission. Mr. Carter commended the Yorktown Design Committee members
on their work in drafting the current proposal. He stated the purpose of
the design guidelines is to protect Yorktown’s unique character and
ensure that new development is compatible with what is currently here
and the history of Yorktown. He stated they also protect and enhance
property values. Mr. Carter noted that the guidelines are based on the
following five principles:
- Acknowledge and respect
Yorktown’s spirit of place, both physically and symbolically
- Take proper care of
Yorktown’s existing resources
- Make changes to existing
resources with restraint
- Let what is old be
dominant over the new
- Follow established design
precedents
Mr. Carter then
reviewed the changes to the document made by the committee and its
recommendation to establish the Historic Yorktown Design Committee (HYDC).
Mr. Wiggins
asked if there was any provision in the guidelines for changes to
building products at a later date.
Mr. Carter
indicated there is flexibility written into the guidelines to consider
new products. If it is determined that the guidelines are not as
flexible as necessary, the Committee can recommend an amendment. He then
noted there are two elements to the proposal--Yorktown Historic District
Overlay and the Yorktown Design Guidelines. The historic district
overlay is a part of zoning ordinance; no change in allowable land uses
(YVA); existing conditions are "grandfathered"; and the Historic
Yorktown Design Committee reviews/implements the program. Certain
actions would be considered exempt, others would be subject to review by
the Zoning Administrator, and others would require review and approval
by the Architectural Review Board. He provided examples of what would be
considered exempt circumstances, what would require administrative
approval, and what would require HYDC approval.
Discussion
followed on the "grandfather" concept.
Mr. Carter
then discussed the review process which he stated was like that for a
public hearing but more informal. Mr. Carter reviewed the differences
between today's requirements and the proposed guidelines. Two separate
areas will be covered by the guidelines--the historic Yorktown core and
the waterfront—which are further divided into three property
types—pivotal, contributing, and non-contributing. He spoke of the areas
addressed by the guidelines, including building orientation, lot
coverage, façade proportions, window patterns, roof forms, materials,
textures, and colors, and provided some examples of specific guidelines
written into the document. Mr. Carter then addressed the impact on
property values, stating the assessments would probably perform higher
because of the guidelines; they provide stability which helps people
make good property investments.
Chairman Burgett
asked how many homeowners live in the historic district.
Mr. Carter
indicated that 208 residents on about 85 lots live in the historic
district.
Chairman Burgett
stated he read the first document, and he felt the committee did a great
job paring it down and making it much better. He stated he thinks it
should be something that the residents in Yorktown can live with.
Mr. Wiggins
noted it has been a very controversial subject for years. He stated he
didn’t know how the committee did it, but they did a good job, and the
members have his appreciation.
Mr. Shepperd
noted there is federal property involved and asked if there was any
consideration given to having the Park Service participate in the
committee.
Mr. Carter
stated the Park Service has reviewed multiple versions of the document,
including the current one. He noted the Park Service follows local
guidelines where possible, but their requirements usually will be more
strict than the County’s.
By consensus
the Board directed that an item for formal action on the Yorktown
Architectural Guidelines be placed on a future agenda for the Board’s
consideration.
Meeting Adjourned.
At 6:34 p.m. Chairman Burgett declared the meeting adjourned sine
die.
_______________________________
________________________________
James O. McReynolds, Clerk
James S. Burgett, Chairman
York County Board of Supervisors
York County Board of Supervisors