|
Meeting Convened. A Regular Meeting of the York County Board of
Supervisors was called to order at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 19,
2002, in the Board Room, York Hall, by Chairman Donald E. Wiggins.
Attendance.
The following members of the Board of Supervisors were present: Walter
C. Zaremba, Sheila S. Noll, Donald E. Wiggins, James S. Burgett, and
Thomas G. Shepperd.
Also in attendance were
James O. McReynolds, County Administrator; and James E. Barnett, County
Attorney.
Invocation.
The invocation was given by Dr. Wayne Price from Grace Episcopal Church.
Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag of the United States of America.
Chairman Wiggins led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Chairman Wiggins
recognized a member from Boy Scout Troop 94 who was present to obtain
his Citizenship Badge.
HIGHWAY MATTERS
Mr. Steven W. Hicks,
Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT),
appeared before the Board to discuss highway matters of interest to York
County. He informed the Board that on the third Wednesday of every month
VDOT would hold a coronation meeting with the County to discuss any
transportation and land development issues. He discussed the previous
issues related to Seaford Road and stated he would try and get the road
overlayed by 2004. He explained VDOT’s position concerning unsafe roads,
and stated it tried to facilitate improvements on secondary roads, and
that the process was at the discretion of the County and the Board. He
stated VDOT would be performing an intersection study at Colonial Road
and Nelson where a stop sign would be installed. He reported on the work
in the Lakeside Drive area, and mentioned that VDOT will be looking into
the drainage issues on Windsor Lane and Lakeside Drive. He discussed
York Crossing Road and whether a center line is needed since the
inception of the no parking ordinance. He addressed Mansion Road and the
development that will happen in that area in approximately one year.
VDOT’s maintenance crew has inspected the road and will determine later
if a culvert should be replaced. He discussed Long Green Boulevard and
its challenging intersection, stating the Department will work on
improving that area. He indicated the drainage improvements on Wilson
Farm Road were challenging and required an environmental permit because
of the difficulties in cleaning the outfall since much of the County is
surrounded by history or wetlands. He stated that VDOT was considering
adding Olde Port Cove to its schedule next year for overlay and a new
asphalt surface. He stated the regional bike trail system at Waller Mill
should be completed soon, and the bridge on Route 17 which was damaged
from a truck had been removed. VDOT personnel will be meeting with the
National Park Service to determine the appropriate type of replacement
bridge needed. The cost for the bridge will not come out of York County
or VDOT‘s funds. Mr. Hicks stated he was hopeful that the Dare Road
project would be completed within 60 days, but the final layer of
asphalt would not be completed until spring.
Mrs. Noll
asked who would pay for the replacement bridge.
Mr. Hicks
stated it would be paid for by the National Park Service.
Mr. Burgett
mentioned the patched area of Winders Pond and Lakeside Drive and that
the manhole was still sticking up above the pavement. He asked that it
be leveled out. He asked about adding yellow lines at intersections and
voiced his concerns over vehicles making a left-hand turn at Winders
Pond. He asked about the yellow lines at York Crossing and VDOT’s
practice on adding yellow lines to roads.
Mr. Hicks
explained if there was no thru traffic it was considered a subdivision
road and originally the traffic engineering department thought out of
the box but were not trying to bring it back within policy. ????? Mark,
can you help?
Mr. Burgett
then mentioned potholes on Dare Road and asked Mr. Hicks to take a look
at those.
Mr. Shepperd
commended VDOT in its effort to respond to requests for improvements. He
discussed Wilson Farm Lane and thanked VDOT for completing that project
and for patching the areas in Olde Port Cove. He stated he would be
contacting Mr. Hicks in the future regarding the timing of stoplights on
Route 17.
Chairman Wiggins
mentioned his concerns regarding the corner of Brightwood Terrace and
Sunshine Way and stated that a stop sign was needed. He asked when the
paving of Route 238 would take place.
Mr. Hicks
stated he will check on the status of the paving and the stop sign.
Chairman Wiggins
asked about Wiley Road and its paving. He explained it had a sharp curve
and, when it rained, the water backed up at the curve preventing a
citizen’s septic tank from working. He asked if a pipe could be run
across the road into the drainage ditch.
Mr. Hicks
expressed his concern about if the work could be done within VDOT’s
right-of-way, and he stated he would look into the matter.
PRESENTATIONS
AUDIT REPORT
Mr. Chris Toney,
a partner with the firm of Goodman and Company, appeared to make a
presentation on the York County Financial Statement. He indicated the
financial statements present fairly the financial position of the County
and the results of its operation in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. He then thanked Carol White and Mary Ann Kirish
of the Department of Financial and Management Services and their staff
for the completion of the necessary financial documents. He also
informed the Board that next year the County’s financial statements will
change drastically as to their content under the Governmental Accounting
Standards Board Opinion Number 34 that the County will be required to
implement next year.
CITIZENS COMMENT PERIOD
Mr. Brian Richards,
manager of Wal-Mart, appeared to update the Board on the progress of the
landscaping issues surrounding Wal-Mart’s neighboring property. He
addressed previous problems in the past with landscaping contractors,
but stated it has now taken steps to correct the problems. Wal-Mart is
installing an irrigation system and will replace the dead shrubs. The
target date for completion is December 10, 2002.
COUNTY ATTORNEY REPORTS AND
REQUESTS
Mr. Barnett
mentioned that he had attended a seminar hosted by the Innovations Group
on HIPA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). This act
ensures that when employees move from one job to another, they don’t
lose health insurance coverage. He will be working with staff to
implement this program?? He stated he sent a draft of the Joint
Development Agreement to the Yorktown Trustees and expressed hope for
its adoption in January. He also explained the need to have Martiau
Street vacated since the property line runs through Nick’s parking lot.
He noted that the County will need to acquire title to this property.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS
AND REQUESTS
Mr. McReynolds
reminded the Board that its joint work session with the School Board had
been rescheduled until after the first of the year, tentatively
scheduled for January 14. He also reminded the Board of its regularly
scheduled meetings on December 3 and December 17, followed by the yearly
organizational meeting on January 7, 2003. He mentioned the possibility
of a Board retreat, and staff will follow up on possible dates.
Meeting Recessed.
At 7:54 p.m. Chairman Wiggins declared a short recess.
Meeting Reconvened.
At 8:02 p.m. the meeting was reconvened in open session by order of the
Chair.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
WATER SUPPLY EMERGENCY
ORDINANCE
Mr. Barnett
made a presentation on proposed Ordinance No. 02-21(R) to declare a
water supply emergency and to adopt restrictions for outdoor water use
and to provide penalties for violations thereof. He explained that the
governor put into effect Emergency Order 33 that declared a statewide
emergency and imposed certain water restrictions. The County enforced
these restrictions by adopting an Emergency Ordinance which is valid for
only 60 days. He stated the language in the proposed ordinance gives the
County a floating ordinance that complies with the Governor’s emergency
order.
Mr. John Hudgins,
Director of Environmental and Development Services, explained that the
water situation was definitely improving, but that the drought
conditions weren’t over. He spoke about some of the Newport News
Waterworks’ restrictions and its plans to drop back to Level I water
restrictions. He explained some other concerns which were groundwater
recharge in the well system in which 6,800 wells were lost statewide.
Mrs. Noll
asked about the Newport News Waterworks’ lost revenues and if fees would
be raised to make up for the lost revenues.
Mr. Hudgins
was not certain as to how the lost revenues would be recovered.
Mr. Burgett
asked if the mandatory Level II water restrictions were still in effect
from Newport News, and if lawns could be watered and cars washed.
Mr. Hudgins
stated the Governor had lifted restrictions on outdoor water use and
that the restrictions were based on previous winter levels.
Discussion ensued on the
water restrictions.
Mr. Zaremba
suggested that the County provide information to the citizens regarding
the water restrictions.
Chairman Wiggins
called to order a public hearing on proposed Ordinance 02-21(R) which
was duly advertised as required by law and is entitled:
AN ORDINANCE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA’S EXECUTIVE ORDER 33
FOR DECLARATION OF A WATER SUPPLY EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA
CODE SECTIONS 15.2-924, 44-146.19, AND 44-146.21 AND TO ADOPT
RESTRICTIONS FOR OUTDOOR WATER USE AND TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR
A VIOLATION THEREOF
There being no one present
who wished to speak concerning the subject ordinance, Chairman
Wiggins closed the public hearing.
Mrs. Noll
then moved the adoption of proposed Ordinance R02-21(R) which reads:
AN ORDINANCE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA’S EXECUTIVE ORDER 33
FOR DECLARATION OF A WATER SUPPLY EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA
CODE SECTIONS 15.2-924, 44-146.19, AND 44-146.21 AND TO ADOPT
RESTRICTIONS FOR OUTDOOR WATER USE AND TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR
A VIOLATION THEREOF
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of
Virginia, the Hampton Roads Area and the County of York have experienced
an extended period of drought and the level of surface water
impoundments, rivers, underground aquifers, and other drinking water
sources have declined substantially; and
WHEREAS, August 30, 2002,
the Governor of Virginia issued Executive Order 33 (2002) which
prohibits many uses of surface water and groundwater, including but not
limited to watering lawns, washing vehicles, filling swimming pools,
irrigating golf courses (with certain limited exceptions for each); and
WHEREAS, the Governor’s
Executive Order 33 (2002) authorizes localities to "establish, collect
and retain fines for violation of these restrictions;" and
WHEREAS, pursuant to
Virginia Code Section 15.2-924, the Board of Supervisors of York County,
Virginia, on September 17, 2002, declared that a water supply emergency
exists and that the adoption of restrictions on the use of outdoor water
is necessary in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the
citizens of the County of York; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to
Virginia Code Section 44-146.21, the Board of Supervisors of York
County, Virginia, on September 17, 2002, declared a local state of
emergency by virtue of the drought, and pursuant to Code of Virginia
Section 44-146.19 adopted an emergency ordinance, Ord. No. 02-18, to
regulate the use of resource systems following the declaration of a
state of emergency by the Governor; and
WHEREAS, Virginia Code
Section 15.2-1427 authorizes local governing bodies to adopt emergency
ordinances effective for a period not to exceed 60 days without public
advertising, and this Board desires to reenact the water emergency
ordinance following public advertisement so that the ordinance will
continue in effect beyond such 60 day period.
NOW, THERFORE, BE IT
ORDAINED by the York County Board of Supervisors this the 19th day of
November, 2002, that the following water usage restrictions are hereby
reenacted, as follows:
Section 1. Declaration of
emergency affecting water supply.
Due to the decreased level
of above ground and underground water supplies affecting the public
water systems serving County residents and the anticipated demand for
water in the immediate future, and due to the Governor’s Executive Order
33 (2002), the Board of Supervisors of York County hereby declares and
finds pursuant to Code of Virginia Sections 15.2-924 and 44-146.21 that
a water supply emergency exists amounting to a local emergency which
necessitates the adoption of this Ordinance mandating restriction on the
use of water in the County under the terms and condition set forth
herein.
Section 2. Definitions.
The following words and
phrases, when used in this Ordinance, shall have the meaning ascribed to
them below, except in those instances where the context clearly
indicates a different meaning:
Assessment date: The date of
the notice imposing the fine for a violation of this Ordinance.
Lawn: Grass areas of any
property, including residential, commercial or industrial areas, but
excluding agricultural fields and athletic fields.
New or refurbished lawn or
fairway: a new lawn or fairway under construction or an existing lawn or
fairway area which has been over-seeded or resodded.
Person: Any individual,
corporation, partnership, association, company, business, trust, joint
venture or other legal entity.
Vehicle: A motor vehicle or
semi-trailer as defined in Virginia Code Section 46.2-100, which
requires titling and registration pursuant to Virginia Code Section
46.2-600 et. seq.
Section 3. Mandatory surface
and ground water use restriction measures.
All persons and households
in the County shall limit their use of water, which includes water from
the public water system, and ground water consistent with the Executive
Order, and in accordance with this section:
(a) Lawns:
Watering of lawns is prohibited at all times. New or refurbished
lawns may be watered for a period not to exceed 30 days.
(b) Vehicle Washing:
Vehicle washing by persons other than commercial car washes is
prohibited at all times. Commercial car washes, auto dealers, body
shops and car rental agencies are permitted to operate under normal
conditions, except that such businesses may not wash corporate fleet
vehicles.
(c) Swimming Pools:
Filling is prohibited at all times, with the exception of pools used
by health care facilities for patient care and rehabilitation, which
are permitted to operate under normal conditions. New or repaired
pools may be filled as needed to maintain the structural integrity
of the pool. Indoor pools may be filled as necessary to ensure
swimmer health and safety.
(d) Golf Courses:
Watering of tees and greens is permitted daily between the hours of
8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. All other watering is prohibited at all
times, except that new and refurbished fairways may be watered for a
period not to exceed 30 days and the hand watering of greens by
means of a hose with an automatic shut-off nozzle which is
continuously attended.
Section 4. When restrictions go
into effect.
The water use restrictions
set forth in this Ordinance shall take effect immediately. The water use
restrictions shall remain in effect, unless the provisions of Executive
Order 33 (2002) are sooner terminated, or amended, or suspended by the
Governor or his duly authorized representatives. In the event of a
termination, amendment or suspension, the County’s enforcement of this
Ordinance shall be similarly terminated, amended or suspended.
Section 5. Violation.
It shall be a violation of
this Ordinance for any person to use water, or allow or cause the use of
water, in violation of the provisions of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Penalty.
- Any person who violates any provision of
this Ordinance shall be subject to the following fines:
(1) For the first offense,
violators shall receive a written warning.
- For the second offense, violators shall
be fined $50.00.
(3) For the third
offense, violators shall be fined $100.00.
(4) For the fourth
offense and subsequent offense, violators shall be fined
$250.00.
(5) Each violation
by a person shall be counted as a separate violation by that
person, irrespective of the location at which the violation
occurs.
(b) The County, or its
designee, shall serve the written warning or assessment of fine by
either:
- Hand delivering the document to the
violator or other adult occupying or employed by a business on the
property where the violation occurred; or
(2) Posting the
document on the front door of the primary structure and mailing,
by first class U.S. Mail, a copy of the document to the owner of
record at the current mailing address contained in the County’s
Real Estate Assessment records for the property where the
violation occurred.
(c) Persons who have
been assessed a fine shall have the right to challenge the
assessment by providing a written notice to the County Administrator
within ten (10) days of the date of the assessment of the penalty.
The County Administrator or his designee shall determine whether the
fine was properly assessed and notify the complaining person in
writing of his determination. Should the County Administrator or his
designee determine that the fine was properly assessed, the person
may challenge that determination within ten (10) calendar days of
receiving the notice of determination by filing an action in court.
(d) The County
Administrator or his designee may waive the penalty if he determines
that the violation occurred due to no fault of the person.
Section 7. Severability.
The provisions of this
Ordinance are severable, and the invalidity of any provision in the
Ordinance, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, shall not
affect the validity of any other provision in the Ordinance.
Section 8. Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall take
effect immediately.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Zaremba, Noll,
Burgett, Shepperd, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
VACATION OF EASEMENT
Mr. Barnett
made a presentation on proposed Resolution R02-191 to authorize the
vacation of a utility easement across property owned by Robert L. and
Michelle A. Calloway in connection with the Tide Mill sewer project.
Chairman Wiggins
called to order a public hearing on proposed Resolution R02-191 which
was duly advertised as required by law and is entitled:
A RESOLUTION TO
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF AN INSTRUMENT VACATING A COUNTY UTILITY
EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY ROBERT L. CALLOWAY AND
MICHELLE A. CALLOWAY IN CONNECTION WITH THE TIDE MILL SEWER
PROJECT
There being no one present
who wished to speak concerning the subject resolution, Chairman
Wiggins closed the public hearing.
Mrs. Noll
moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-191 that reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF AN INSTRUMENT VACATING A COUNTY UTILITY
EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY ROBERT L. CALLOWAY AND
MICHELLE A. CALLOWAY IN CONNECTION WITH THE TIDE MILL SEWER
PROJECT
WHEREAS, by virtue of an
easement deed dated August 9, 2001, and recorded as Instrument No.
010015133 in the Clerk's Office of the York County Circuit Court, a
permanent utility easement was created across certain property owned by
the landowners in connection with the construction of the Tide Mill
sewer project; and
WHEREAS, existing
underground utilities were discovered on the landowner's property that
hindered the ability of the contractor to install the sewer line; and
WHEREAS, the landowners have
conveyed to the County appropriately relocated additional easements in
exchange for the vacation of the existing easement which will be
rendered superfluous by reason of the dedication; and
WHEREAS, this matter has
been duly advertised for a public hearing as required by Code of
Virginia § 15.2-1800, and this Board is of the opinion that such
easement should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this 19th day of
November, 2002, that the County Administrator be, and is hereby
authorized, for and on behalf of the Board to execute an instrument
vacating the said easement, such instrument to be approved as to form by
the County Attorney.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5)
Noll, Burgett, Shepperd, Zaremba, Wiggins,
Nay: (0)
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
WILIAMSBURG FOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
Mr. Barnett
made a presentation on proposed Resolution R02-159 to approve a
Voluntary Agreement of Annexation and Deannexation between the County of
York, Virginia, and the City of Williamsburg, Virginia.
Mr. Shepperd
referred to the section of the State code that deals with annexation and
asked if it protects York County from annexation and what the
implications were.
Mr. Barnett
explained the County is immune from city-initiated annexation and that
this action is a voluntary boundary line adjustment.
Chairman Wiggins
called to order a public hearing on proposed Resolution R02-159 which
was duly advertised as required by law and is entitled:
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING A VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT OF ANNEXATION AND DEANNEXATION
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF YORK, VIRGINIA, AND THE CITY OF
WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA
There being
no one present who wished to speak concerning
the subject resolution, Chairman Wiggins closed the public
hearing.
Mrs. Noll
then moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-159 that reads:
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING A VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT OF ANNEXATION AND DEANNEXATION
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF YORK, VIRGINIA, AND THE CITY OF
WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, there exist a
number of parcels of real estate in the vicinity of Richmond Road (U. S.
Route 60) and Mooretown Road (State Route 603) which are divided by the
common boundary line between the County of York and the City of
Williamsburg; and
WHEREAS, the public interest
will be served by a relocation of the common boundary line between the
City and the County in order to wholly incorporate such parcels into
either the City or the County as shown on a plat consisting of one sheet
entitled "Jurisdictional Boundary Adjustment Between York County,
Virginia, and City of Williamsburg," dated April 11, 2002, revised
September 10, 2002, and on a plat consisting of two sheets entitled
"Jurisdictional Boundary Adjustment Between York County, Virginia, and
City of Williamsburg," dated April 15, 2002, revised September 10, 2002,
both plats made by Precision Measurements, Inc. which are hereby made a
part of this resolution by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this 19th
day of November, 2002, that pursuant to Code of Virginia §§ 15.2-3106 et
seq, the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and/or the York County
Administrator are authorized to execute a certain voluntary agreement
for annexation and deannexation between the County of York and the City
of Williamsburg, Virginia, as attached to the County Attorney's
memorandum of October 28, 2002, relocating the common boundary line
between the two jurisdictions as shown in the above-referenced plat; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the County Administrator and the County Attorney are authorized to take
such further action as may be required pursuant to the Code of Virginia
§§ 15.2-3108 et seq to petition the circuit court of the City of
Williamsburg or the County of York to enter an appropriate order
approving such voluntary agreement.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Burgett, Shepperd, Zaremba, Noll,
Wiggins,
Nay: (0)
APPLICATION NO. UP-606-02,
ZAC ENTERPRISES
Mr. Mark Carter,
Planning and Zoning Manager, made a presentation on Application No.
UP-606-02 requesting a use permit to authorize a drive-in restaurant at
721 East Rochambeau Drive. The Planning Commission considered the
application and forwarded it to the Board of Supervisors with a
recommendation of approval, and staff recommended approval of the
application through the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-175.
Mr. Shepperd
asked if the facility would fit if the property were smaller and if
there was room for an addition if needed. He asked about the traffic
volume at a fast food restaurant as opposed to a retail establishment.
Mr. Carter
agreed that the facility could have been smaller, and he explained that
the ordinance requires only 10 feet on each side. He stated the area
could accommodate an addition if needed. He explained that since the
facility would be used as a fast food restaurant, the traffic generation
numbers would be different. He added that, as part of the site plan
submission, the applicant will have to submit an amended traffic study
to document that this particular use does not in any way adversely
impact the traffic improvements that are already proposed for the
shopping center.
Mr. Shepperd
asked about the berm used to shield the buffer site from East Rochambeau
Drive.
Mr. Carter
described the purpose of the berm which is to help obscure the direct
lines of vision to the parking areas.
Chairman Wiggins
called to order a public hearing on Application No. UP-606-02 which was
duly advertised as required by law. Proposed Resolution R02-175 is
entitled:
A RESOLUTION TO
APPROVE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE A DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
AT 721 EAST ROCHAMBEAU DRIVE
There being no one present
who wished to speak concerning the subject application, Chairman
Wiggins closed the public hearing.
Mr. Zaremba
asked if the cones would be installed as shown in the drawings, and he
referred to the non-colonial design that the building presented. He
expressed concern about the future of the building should the business
close.
Mr. Carter
stated the cones would be installed, and he pointed out that the tall
sign, as indicated on the photograph, would not be allowed under the
ordinance and would not be installed.
Discussion followed.
Chairman Wiggins
pointed out that the site plan had been submitted to the City of
Williamsburg but that no comments or responses were received.
Mr. Carter
explained that the Planning Commission agendas, including the background
material, are automatically sent to both Williamsburg and James City
County. He confirmed that no comments were received by the City of
Williamsburg or James City County.
Mrs. Noll
asked if the same procedure was used for the City of Hampton and the
City of Newport News.
Mr. Carter
stated the standard practice is to distribute the agendas to all the
surrounding localities.
Mr. Harry Matthews, Jr.,
Director of Engineering for The Taf Group, stated that ZAC Enterprises
fully intended to be a good citizen of the County and the good faith
effort is represented in part by the landscaping that has been
presented.
Mr. Burgett
asked how many Sonics exist in the United States.
Mr. Bill Ganning,
representing ZAC Enterprises, stated there are over 2,000 restaurants in
the United States.
Mr. Burgett
moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-175 which reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
APPROVE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE A DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT
AT 721 EAST ROCHAMBEAU DRIVE
WHEREAS, ZAC Enterprises has
submitted Application No. UP-606-02, which requests a special use
permit, pursuant to Section 24.1-306 (Category 11, No. 15) of the York
County Zoning Ordinance, to authorize a drive-in restaurant located at
721 East Rochambeau Drive (Route F-137) and further identified as
Assessor’s Parcel No. 2-17-B; and
WHEREAS, said application
has been referred to the York County Planning Commission in accordance
with applicable procedure; and
WHEREAS, the Planning
Commission recommends approval of this application; and
WHEREAS, the York County
Board of Supervisors has conducted a duly advertised public hearing on
this application; and
WHEREAS, the Board has
carefully considered the public comments and Planning Commission
recommendation with respect to this application;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this the 19th day of
November, 2002, that Application No. UP-606-02 be, and it is hereby,
approved to authorize a drive-in restaurant subject to the following
conditions:
- This use permit shall authorize a
drive-in restaurant located at 721 East Rochambeau Drive (Route F-137)
and further identified as Assessor’s Parcel No. 2-17-B.
- A site plan prepared in accordance with
the provisions of Article V of the York County Zoning Ordinance shall
be submitted to and approved by the York County Department of
Environmental and Development Services, Division of Development and
Compliance prior to the commencement of any construction activities on
the subject parcel. Except as modified herein, said site plan shall be
in substantial conformance with the plan titled "Sonic @ Rochambeau,
York County, VA;" sheet L-1 of 11, prepared by The TAF Group, dated
July 25, 2002, received by the Planning Division August 28, 2002 and
building elevations submitted to the Planning Division on July 31,
2002.
- Freestanding identification signage shall
be limited to a single monument sign in substantial conformance with
the monument sign elevation received by the Planning Division on
August 28, 2002. Brick fascia used on the base of the sign shall match
that of the building façade.
- Brick used for the façade of the building
as shown in architectural elevations submitted by the applicant shall
be of a material and color that is compatible with the brick used for
the Lowe’s and Wal-Mart stores co-located within the Cedar Valley
Shopping Center.
- A traffic impact analysis, prepared by a
transportation engineer or transportation planner in accordance with
the requirements set forth in Section 24.1-251(b)(1) of the York
County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted for review and
consideration by the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation at time of initial application for site plan approval.
- With the exception of the decorative neon
lighting on the exterior of the canopies and poles at the west end of
the building, site lighting shall be shielded and directed downward to
prevent off-site illumination. All lighting schemes and lighting
fixtures shall be consistent with the lighting recommended by the
Illumination Engineering Society of North America (IESNA).
- Volume levels of all outside speakers
shall be such that speaker sound is not audible off-site.
- Landscaping shall be substantially in
accordance with the plan referenced in Condition #2 above. To
accomplish buffering of East Rochambeau Drive, landscaping on the berm
at the west end of the site shall be a mix of evergreen and deciduous
trees and shrubs in a ratio satisfactory to the Zoning Administrator.
- In accordance with the provisions of
Section 24.1-115(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, significant modifications
to this approval as determined by the Zoning Administrator shall
require that a new use permit application be submitted for review.
Modifications can be administratively approved if the Zoning
Administrator determines the modification to be minor.
- In accordance with Section 24.1-115(b)(7)
of the York County Zoning Ordinance, a certified copy of the
resolution authorizing this special use permit shall be recorded at
the expense of the applicant in the name of the property owner as
grantor in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Shepperd, Zaremba,
Noll, Burgett, Wiggins,
Nay: (0)
APPLICATION NO. UP-608-02
YORK COUNTY VOLUNTEER ASSOCIATION
Mr. Carter
made a presentation on Application No. 608-02 requesting an amendment to
a previously approved Special Use Permit authorizing a 3,700 square foot
expansion of the Bargain Box Thrift Store at 222 Dare Road. The Planning
Commission considered the application and forwarded it to the Board of
Supervisors with a recommendation of approval, and staff recommended
approval of the application through the adoption of proposed Resolution
R02-186.
Chairman Wiggins
called to order a public hearing on Application No. UP-608-02 which was
duly advertised as required by law. Proposed Resolution R02-186 is
entitled:
A RESOLUTION TO
APPROVE AN APPLICATION TO AMEND A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SPECIAL
USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE A 3,700-SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION OF THE
BARGAIN BOX THRIFT STORE AT 222 DARE ROAD
There being no one present
who wished to speak concerning the subject application, Chairman
Wiggins closed the public hearing.
Mr. Burgett
then moved the adoption of proposed Resolution
R02-186 which reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
APPROVE AN APPLICATION TO AMEND A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SPECIAL
USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE A 3,700-SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION OF THE
BARGAIN BOX THRIFT STORE AT 222 DARE ROAD
WHEREAS, the York County
Volunteer Association has submitted Application No. UP-608-02, which
requests an amendment to a previously approved Special Use Permit to
authorize a 3,700-square foot expansion of The Bargain Box thrift store
located on 2.3 acres of land located at 222 Dare Road (Route 621) and
further identified as Assessor’s Parcel No. 29-3-1; and
WHEREAS, said application
has been forwarded to the York County Planning Commission in accordance
with applicable procedure; and
WHEREAS, the Planning
Commission recommends approval of this application; and
WHEREAS, the York County
Board of Supervisors has conducted a duly advertised public hearing on
this application; and
WHEREAS, the Board has
carefully considered the public comments with respect to this
application;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this the 19th
day of November, 2002, that Application No. UP-608-02 be, and it is
hereby, approved to amend a previously approved Special Use Permit to
authorize a 3,700-square foot expansion of The Bargain Box thrift store
located at 222 Dare Road (Route 621) and further identified as
Assessor’s Parcel No. 29-3-1 subject to the following conditions:
- This approval shall amend a previously
approved Special Use Permit (Application No. 75-UP4, approved by the
York County Board of Supervisors on April 3, 1975) to authorize a
3,700-square foot expansion of The Bargain Box thrift store located at
222 Dare Road (Route 621) and further identified as Assessor’s Parcel
No. 29-3-1.
- A site plan prepared in accordance with
the provisions of Article V of the York County Zoning Ordinance shall
be submitted to and approved by the York County Department of
Environmental and Development Services, Division of Development and
Compliance, prior to the commencement of any construction or land
clearing activities on the site. Except as modified herein, said site
plan shall be in substantial conformance with the sketch plan
submitted by the applicant, a copy of which shall be kept on file in
the York County Department of Environmental and Development Services,
Division of Development and Compliance.
- Pursuant to Section 24.1-323(b) of the
Zoning Ordinance, the minimum side yard building setback shall be
fifteen feet (15’) rather than ten feet (10’) as depicted on the
referenced sketch plan.
- The existing septic tank shall be
relocated prior to the issuance of a building permit for the building
addition. The relocated septic system shall meet all applicable
requirements of this Code and the Virginia Department of Health.
Specifically, in accordance with Section 7.1-14(b) of the York County
Code, no structure shall be within five feet (5’) of the septic tank
and eight feet (8’) of the drain field, measured horizontally.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Zaremba, Noll,
Burgett, Shepperd, Wiggins,
Nay: (0)
APPLICATION NO. UP-609-02,
YORK RIVER, LLC
Mr. Carter
made a presentation on Application No. UP-609-02 requesting a use permit
to authorize an office within an existing building located at 3201 Old
Williamsburg Road. The Planning Commission considered the application
and forwarded it to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of
approval, and staff recommended approval of the application through the
adoption of proposed Resolution R02-187.
Mr. Burgett
asked if this would be the main office for the business, and he
addressed the HUB funding qualifications. He mentioned the importance of
hiring employees from York County to receive the HUB funding.
Mr. Carter
stated this HUB zone was located on property rezoned in the Lackey area,
and that all of Census Tract 505 was a HUB zone. He pointed out that it
was still a HUB zone under the federal guidelines, and what the Board
did with the recent rezoning was to substantially increase the
opportunity and attractiveness of the Lackey commercial area for other
businesses.
Mrs. Noll
noted that 35 percent of the employees have to be hired from the HUB
zone, but not necessarily from the Lackey area. They can be hired from
any HUB zone.
Mr. Zaremba
asked Mr. Carter to explain for the citizens what a HUB zone was.
Mr. Carter
stated HUB zone stands for Historically Underutilized Business Zone,
which is a program designation by the federal government that provides
opportunities for preferential treatment under the federal procurement
process. It provides incentives for businesses that operate from within
HUB zones to compete in the procurement process. The requirement is that
the businesses hire at least 35 percent of its employees who reside in a
HUB zone, whether or not it is that particular HUB zone or another HUB
zone. It is a business incentive that is designed to encourage
employment and investment in the community.
Chairman Wiggins
called to order a public hearing on Application No. UP-609-02 which was
duly advertised as required by law. Proposed Resolution R02-187 is
entitled:
A RESOLUTION TO
APPROVE AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE AN
OFFICE WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT 3201 OLD
WILLIAMSBURG ROAD.
Ms. Kathy McQuade,
President of York River Electric, appeared to support the application
and to answer any of the Board’s questions. She stated that York River
Electric wishes to remain in the County as a HUB zone business.
There being no one else
present who wished to speak concerning the subject application,
Chairman Wiggins closed the public hearing.
Mrs. Noll
then moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-186 that reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
APPROVE AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO AUTHORIZE AN
OFFICE WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT 3201 OLD
WILLIAMSBURG ROAD.
WHEREAS, York River Electric
has submitted Application No. UP-609-02, pursuant to Section 24.1-306
(Category 11, No. 9) of the York County Zoning Ordinance, which requests
a Special Use Permit to authorize the conversion of an existing
single-family residence to an office building located at 3201 Old
Williamsburg Road and further identified as Assessor’s Parcel No.
018-4-3; and
WHEREAS, said application
has been referred to the York County Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning
Commission recommends approval of this application; and
WHEREAS, the York County
Board of Supervisors has conducted a duly advertised public hearing on
this application in accordance with applicable procedure; and
WHEREAS, the Board has given
careful consideration to the public comments and Planning Commission
recommendation with respect to this application;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this the 19th
day of November, 2002, that Application No. UP-609-02 be, and it is
hereby, approved to authorize a Special Use Permit, pursuant to Section
24.1-306 (Category 11, No. 9) of the York County Zoning Ordinance,
subject to the following conditions:
- This use permit shall authorize the
establishment of an office in an existing structure on property
located at 3201 Old Williamsburg Road and further identified as
Assessor’s Parcel No. 18-4-3.
- A site plan prepared in accordance with
the provisions of Article V of the York County Zoning Ordinance shall
be submitted to and approved by the County prior to establishment of
the office on the subject property. This shall include a landscape
plan depicting ten (10) foot vegetative buffers along all property
lines. Except as modified herein, the site plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the sketch plan by Campbell Land
Surveying, Inc., titled "Site Improvement Sketch, York River
Electric," prepared and dated August 23, 2002.
- Appearance and arrangement of lighting
shall be of a form, character, appearance and arrangement fully
compatible with the residential area.
- Signage shall be limited to one (1)
twenty-four (24) square foot freestanding, ground-mounted monument
type sign with a maximum height of six (6) feet.
- Connection to the County sewer system
shall be required in accordance with Section 18.1-62 (a) of the York
County Code in the event the property at some future time is deemed to
have access to the County sewer facilities.
- The existing driveways on the eastern
side of the property shall be removed. The western entrance shall be
in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)
standards for commercial entrances.
- The existing entrance ditch area shall be
reshaped to ensure the entrance drainage pipe properly drains.
- In accordance with Section 24.1-115(b)(7)
of the York County Zoning Ordinance, a certified copy of the
resolution authorizing this special use permit shall be recorded at
the expense of the applicant in the name of the property owner as
grantor in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Noll, Burgett,
Shepperd, Zaremba, Wiggins,
Nay: (0)
MATTERS PRESENTED BY THE BOARD
Mr. Burgett
stated he had attended a meeting of the Congressional First District
Committee in an effort to keep the local military bases open. He stated
he attended the Economic Development’s Occasion for Industry dinner and
the open house of Ryson International. He also attended the Youth
Commission meeting, the Greater Peninsula Workforce Development
Consortium, and the Workforce Investment Board Retreat. He suggested
that the Dean of the Peninsula Workforce Development Center appear
before the Board to make a presentation on workforce development in the
near future. Mr. Burgett stated he attended the Senior Center’s Eleventh
Year Anniversary, and he will be meeting with school administrators and
staff on Thursday to keep up with what is going on in the schools. He
thanked John Hudgins and Al Maddalena for helping a citizen in his
district with a new subdivision.
Mr. Shepperd
reported on the Town Meeting he held on October 30 at Tabb Elementary
School, stating that between 65-70 people from his district attended. He
thanked the staff for its help in coordinating the meeting and the
volunteers for handing out the flyers. He noted he plans on conducting
another meeting in March or April. He stated he was Chairman of the
Regional Issues Committee which is made of James City County,
Williamsburg, and York County; and he elaborated on some of the issues
concerning this committee. He stated the staff of the three localities
were going to come together to discuss the Comprehensive Plans from each
of them, and they will take a look at the zoning of the Route 199
corridor. He cited other examples of what the committee is proposing.
Mrs. Noll
spoke on attending the VACo Conference, stating one of the topics was
the State's budget. The Governor was a keynote speaker at the conference
to discuss the budget. She thanked the election officials who worked
election day with the difficulty they faced because of the new election
precincts established by the last Census. She noted that President Bush
had declared November as Military Family Month, and stated are many
military families that devote a great deal of time to our schools and
sports clubs and volunteer generally. She commented on a letter from the
Landmark Design Group that complimented and Al Maddalena and his staff
for their assistance on the approval process for the Water Country
Action Riversite??? Development Plan. Mrs. Noll stated she had attended
the Workforce Development Dinner with a national speaker who indicated
Virginia is doing well in its plans for workforce development. She noted
she had attended a Historical Triangle Working Group that deals with the
activities planned for the 2007 celebration, and she stated one of the
items the group is working on is the transportation issues that will
impact the area locally.
Mr. Zaremba
reported on an editorial in the Daily Press entitled "Local
Government Can’t Clean-Up the State’s Mess." He read some of the
comments from the article, including that the Clerk of Court’s Office in
the City of Hampton will be losing $70,000 which will mean staff
layoffs. The Commonwealth Attorney’s Office faces an $82,000 cut,
implying layoffs and that the office may stop prosecuting some
misdemeanor cases. He cited more examples of cuts and implied layoffs.
He stated that York County’s Clerk of Court has advised the Board of the
expected shortfall in that office and has requested that the Board help
meet the shortfall. He expressed his concern about the services and
programs that will be affected by the State’s budget cuts.
Chairman Wiggins
noted he had also attended several meetings where the main topic of
discussion was the State’s budget cuts. The consensus of those attending
the meetings was that the localities would not pick up any of the slack
that was created by the State’s cutbacks. He stated that on October 18
he attended an awards ceremony sponsored by the Daily Press
honoring local public safety professionals. The York County employees
who received awards were Lt. Richard Paul Long; Donna Galganski-Pabst,
Firefighter/Paramedic; Jane Jackson, 911 Telecommunicator; and David
Bark, Deputy Sheriff/Crime Prevention Officer. He thanked everyone
involved in helping with the Yorktown Day celebration on October 19.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mrs. Noll
moved that the Consent Calendar be approved as submitted, Item Nos. 7,
8, 9, and 10, respectively.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Burgett, Shepperd,
Zaremba, Noll, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
Thereupon, the following
minutes were approved and resolutions adopted:
October 1, 2002, Regular
Meeting.
October 8, 2002, Adjourned
Meeting.
October 15, 2002, Regular
Meeting.
Item No. 8. COLONIAL AREA
FAMILY AND INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE FATILITY REVIEW TEAM: Resolution
R02-189.
A RESOLUTION TO
ESTABLISH THE COLONIAL AREA FAMILY AND INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
FATALITY REVIEW TEAM
WHEREAS, the establishment
of the Colonial Area Family and Intimate Partner Violence Fatality
Review Team would serve the following purposes:
- identifying and describing trends and
patterns of domestic violence related deaths in the cities of
Williamsburg and Poquoson, as well as, the counties of York and
James City;
- increasing coordination and
communication between agencies providing services to families
experiencing domestic violence;
- and identifying interventions aimed at
system improvements.
WHEREAS, family and intimate
partner violence has destructive consequences upon individuals and
families within this region; and
WHEREAS, the General
Assembly enacted Section 32.1-283.3 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, to permit locales to establish a family violence fatality
review team to examine fatal family violence incidents and to create a
body of information to help prevent future family violence fatalities;
and
WHEREAS, careful examination
of family and intimate partner violence fatalities will yield results to
help prevent similar tragedies from recurring; and
WHEREAS, a thoughtful and
nonjudgmental method of evaluating the events that lead to family and
intimate partner violence fatalities will create a safer community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this 19th
day of November, 2002, that the County Administrator be, and he is
hereby, directed to take the steps necessary to establish The Colonial
Area Family and Intimate Partner Violence Fatality Review Team.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Colonial Area Family and Intimate Partner Violence Fatality Review
Team shall have the authority to review the facts and circumstances of
all the family and intimate partner violence incidents that occur within
the County of York and all information and records obtained or created
regarding the review of a fatality shall be considered confidential and
shall be excluded from the Virginia Freedom of Information Act.
BE IT STILL FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Colonial Area Family and Intimate Partner Violence
Fatality Review Team will identify gaps in system responses and work to
provide increased communication and collaboration amongst the agencies
involved.
BE IT STILL FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Colonial Area Family and Intimate Partner Violence
Fatality Review Team will operate under the assumption that all persons
and agencies involved care deeply about preventing violence within the
family and operate in good faith, using the best judgment and
information available at the time.
BE IT STILL FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the following individuals, or their designee, may serve
on the Team pursuant to Section 32.1-283.3 (D) of the Code of Virginia:
|
Commonwealth’s Attorney Office |
Williamsburg/James City
County
Commonwealth’s Attorney
Mike McGinty
York County & Poquoson
Commonwealth’s Attorney
Eileen Addison |
|
Domestic Violence
Program Professional |
Avalon: A Center for
Women and Children
Executive Director
Barbara Seibert |
|
Mental Health
Professionals |
Colonial Mental Health
Outpatient Counseling Director
Randy Walton, Ph.D. |
|
Health Care Community |
Williamsburg Community
Hospital
Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners Program Administrator, Jamie
Sanderson |
|
Law Enforcement
Officials |
James City County Police
Chief Daigneault
Poquoson Police
Department
Chief White
Williamsburg Police
Chief Yost
York County Sheriff’s
Office
Sheriff Diggs |
|
Medical Examiner |
Dr. Provenzano |
|
Probation Professionals |
Colonial Community
Corrections
Director
Katie Green |
|
Department of Social
Services |
James City County DSS
Director
Diana Hutchens
York County/Poquoson DSS
Director
Earl Blythe
Williamsburg DSS
Director
Peter Walentisch |
|
Other disciplines/members may participate at
the discretion of the team. |
BE IT STILL FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Colonial Area Fatality Review Team will offer
recommendations to area service providers which benefit our communities
and improve our public safety.
BE IT STILL FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the York County Board of Supervisors, as well as, the
local governing boards of the cities of Williamsburg and Poquoson and
the County of James City, will establish the Colonial Area Family and
Intimate Partner Violence Fatality Review Team, and the Team shall
establish local rules and procedures to govern the review process.
BE IT STILL FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the members of the Fatality Review Team shall elect a
Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson and that these positions will rotate
among the members.
Item No. 9. EMPLOYEE OF THE
QUARTER: Resolution R02-192.
A RESOLUTION TO
COMMEND FRANCES C. WILSON IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH’S
ATTORNEY AS EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER
WHEREAS, Frances C. Wilson
has been employed in the Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney since
July of 1997, and currently holds the position of Victim-Witness
Director; and
WHEREAS, in addition to her
regular duties, Ms. Wilson has taken on other responsibilities such as
Chairperson for the York/Poquoson Child Advocacy Team in which she
planned a Celebrity Luncheon for the purpose of raising funds for Child
Advocacy activities; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Wilson has also
raised money for the County’s Relay for Life Team and single-handedly
planned a Candlelight Vigil that was held outside the Courthouse for
Victims Rights Week; and
WHEREAS, while being
involved in all of these activities, Ms. Wilson’s work has never
faltered, nor did her positive attitude and disposition;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this 19th
day of November, 2002, that Frances C. Wilson, Victim Witness Director,
be, and she is hereby, congratulated upon her selection as Employee of
the Quarter for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
Item No. 10. REQUEST FOR
APPROVAL FOR TAX REFUND: Resolution R02-195.
A RESOLUTION TO
AUTHORIZE A TAX REFUND TO VERIZON WIRELESS
WHEREAS, York County Code §
21-7.3 requires approval from the Board of Supervisors for the payment
of any refund of taxes, penalties and interest in excess of $2,500.00;
and
WHEREAS, Verizon Wireless
has made a proper request for a tax refund for overpaid public service
taxes due to a corrected assessment from the State Corporation
Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of
the Revenue, the Treasurer, and the County Attorney have recommended
that the request for a tax refund, with interest, be granted in the
amount of $3,633.42;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this 19th
day of November, 2002, that the Commissioner of the Revenue is
authorized to refund to Verizon Wireless overpaid public service taxes
in the amount of $3,487.97, plus accrued interest in the amount of
$145.45, for a total refund of $3,633.42.
NEW BUSINESS
APPLICATION NO. YVA-16-02,
HUNTER FLETCHER, 223 NELSON STREET
Mr. Carter
made a presentation on Application No. YVA-16-02 requesting the
construction of an addition to a single-family residence located at 223
Nelson Street in Yorktown. Staff recommended approval of the application
through the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-197.
Chairman Wiggins
asked if the proposed Historic Yorktown Design Committee was assembled
as suggested by the Planning Commission.
Mr. Carter
suggested that if the Board chose to go forward with the Historic
District and the Design Guidelines, they also amend the Zoning Ordinance
to eliminate the requirement for single-family detached construction to
come before the Board for approval.
Mrs. Noll
then moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-197 which reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
APPROVE THE REQUEST OF G. HUNTER FLETCHER FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF AN ADDITION TO A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 223
NELSON STREET IN YORKTOWN
WHEREAS, G. Hunter Fletcher
has submitted an application requesting permission to construct an
addition to the existing single-family residence located at 223 Nelson
Street in Yorktown; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section
24.1-327(b)(3) of the York County Zoning Ordinance, such requests may be
approved by the Board of Supervisors by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the proposed
addition’s location and design are compatible with adjacent properties
and structures;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this the 19th
day of November, 2002, that the request of G. Hunter Fletcher for the
construction of a single-story addition to the existing residence
located at 223 Nelson Street, as described in the County Administrator’s
report to the Board dated November 6, 2002, be, and it is hereby,
approved.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Shepperd, Zaremba,
Noll, Burgett, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
SPEED LIMIT PROVISIONS –
SHERWOOD FOREST, HERON’S WALK, TIDEMILL ESTATES, GREENLANDS AND
ADJOINING SUBDIVISIONS
Mr. Carter
made a presentation on proposed Resolution R02-196(R) to request that
the Virginia Department of Transportation install appropriate signs to
establish increased penalties for speeding on certain streets within the
Sherwood Forest, Heron’s Walk, Tidemill Estates, Greenlands and
adjoining subdivisions.
Mr. Burgett
pointed out that Denise Drive was in Tidemill Estates and asked if the
resolution should reflect that.
Mr. Carter
noted that several streets had been added into the state’s highway
system and asked that those streets also be included in Resolution
R02-196(R).
Mr. Shepperd
asked about the effectiveness of the $200 fine.
Mr. Carter
stated that staff had received indications from the residents of Tabb
Lakes and Coventry that the signs have a significant impact on the
speeding situation. The Sheriff’s Department has also indicated that the
signs are a very effective deterrent, and it has noticed a decline in
speeding instances where the signs have been put into place.
Mr. Shepperd
mentioned the upcoming opening of Robin Hood Drive in the Running Man
neighborhood. The road does not yet have houses, and speeding frequently
occurs through the area. He stated he had received complaints from
citizens that there may be an overabundance of the $200 speeding signs.
Mr. Carter
indicated that other measures were available, but they were difficult to
achieve and put into place.
Mrs. Noll
then moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-196(R-1) which reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
REQUEST THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INSTALL
APPROPRIATE SIGNS, AS STIPU-LATED IN SECTION 46.2-878.2 OF THE
CODE OF VIRGINIA, TO ESTABLISH INCREASED PENALTIES FOR SPEEDING
ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE SHERWOOD FOREST, HERON’S WALK,
TIDEMILL ESTATES, GREENLANDS AND AJOINING SUBDIVISIONS
WHEREAS, Section 46.2-878.2
of the Code of Virginia authorizes the posting of certain
residential streets for an increased fine of $200, in addition to other
penalties prescribed by law, for vehicles exceeding the maximum
established speed limit; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT) is responsible for administering the
regulations established to implement this law and will entertain
requests for establishing the restrictions upon receipt of a formal
request and resolution from the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, residents of
Sherwood Forest, Heron’s Walk, Tidemill Estates and the Greenlands
subdivisions have requested that said restrictions be imposed on streets
within their developments; and
WHEREAS, the York County
Board of Supervisors perceives that a speeding problem exists based on
the observations of the residents and enforcement records reported by
the York County Sheriff’s office; and
WHEREAS, streets in the
subdivisions/areas adjoining Heron’s Walk/Tidemill Estates and the
Greenlands have been previously designated for the increased penalties
and consistency and continuity will be served if the interconnecting
streets are also designated; and
WHEREAS, the subject
communities have indicated their support for such designations through
their homeowners associations or thorough individual signatures; and
WHEREAS, the Board of
Supervisors has reviewed these requests and believes that the designated
roads meet the eligibility requirements prescribed by VDOT;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this the 19th
day of November, 2002, that the Virginia Department of Transportation
be, and it is hereby, requested to approve and install signs pursuant to
Section 46.2-878.2 of the Code of Virginia, to designate the
following street segments as a street on which a fine of $200 in
addition to other penalties prescribed by law may be imposed for
violations of the posted speed limit:
Sherwood Forest
- Robin Hood Drive (Route 1604) from
Route 134 to end
Heron’s Walk
- Sanctuary Cove (Route 1593) from
Yorktown road to end
- Denise Drive (Route 1536) from
Sanctuary Cove to Tidemill Road
Greenlands
- Tristen Drive (Route 1665) from Long
Green Boulevard to end
- Jonathan Junction (Route 1695) from
Tristen Drive to Tabb Lakes Drive (located in Tabb Lakes)
- Blevins Run (Route 1668) from Long
Green Boulevard to Kerr Lane
- Kerr Lane (Route 1686) from Blevins Run
to Jara Lane
- Jara Lane (Route 1687) from Kerr Lane
to Hilda Hollow
- Hilda Hollow (Route 1497) from Jara
Lane to Gardenville Drive
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the County Administrator is requested to forward a copy of this
resolution and any necessary supporting documentation to the Virginia
Department of Transportation for its review and approval.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Zaremba, Noll,
Burgett, Shepperd, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
CLOSED MEETING.
At 10:09 p.m. Mr. Zaremba moved that the meeting be convened in
Closed Meeting pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(a)(1) of the Code of
Virginia pertaining to appointments to Boards and Commissions; Section
2.2-3711(a)(3) pertaining to real property used for a public purpose
specifically pertaining to the acquisition of real property for a public
purpose; and Section 2.2-3711(a)(5) to discuss a prospective business or
industry or expansion of an existing business or industry where no
previous announcement has been made.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Noll, Burgett,
Shepperd, Zaremba, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
Meeting Reconvened.
At 11:28 p.m. the meeting was reconvened in open session by order of the
Chair.
Mrs. Noll
moved the adoption of proposed Resolution SR-1 that reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
CERTIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REGARDING
MEETING IN CLOSED MEETING
WHEREAS, the York County
Board of Supervisors has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant
to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of
the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3711.1
of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the York County
Board of Supervisors that such closed meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors this the 19th day of
November, 2002, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member’s
knowledge, (1) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open
meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed
meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and (2) only
such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the closed meeting were heard, discussed, or considered by the York
County Board of Supervisors.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Burgett, Shepperd,
Zaremba, Noll, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
APPOINTMENT TO THE
STORMWATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Mr. Zaremba
moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-194 which reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
APPOINT MEMBERS TO THE STORMWATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
BE IT RESOLVED by the York
County Board of Supervisors this the 19th day of November,
2002, that the following individuals be, and they are hereby, appointed
as voting members to the York County Stormwater Advisory Committee, such
appointments to take effect December 1, 2002, and expire on November 30,
2003.
Edward G. Moninger District 1
George S.
Hrichak District 4
Donald W. Davis
District 4
M. Kenneth
Taylor, Jr. District 5
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Shepperd, Zaremba,
Noll, Burgett, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
APPOINTMENT TO THE YORK
COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING/SUBDIVISION APPEALS
Mr. Burgett
moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-184 which reads:
A RESOLUTION TO
RECOMMEND THE APPOINTMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL TO THE YORK COUNTY
BOARD OF ZONING/SUBDIVISION APPEALS
WHEREAS, the term of Donald
W. Davis on the York County Board of Zoning/Subdivision Appeals expires
on December 31, 2002; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Davis was first
appointed to the Board of Zoning/Subdivision Appeals on March 8, 1996,
to fill the unexpired term of Agnes B. McGhee; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Davis has
served as Vice Chairman and presently serves as Chairman of the Board of
Zoning/Subdivision Appeals; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Davis is
eligible for reappointment to said Board and has indicated he wishes to
serve another term;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the York County Board of Supervisors, this the 19th
day of November, 2002, that Donald W. Davis be, and he hereby is,
recommended for appointment to the York County Board of
Zoning/Subdivision Appeals, such term to begin January 1, 2003, and
expire December 31, 2007.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Zaremba, Noll,
Burgett, Shepperd, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
Meeting Adjourned.
At 11:32 p.m. Mr. Zaremba moved that the meeting be adjourned to
7:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 26, 2002, in the Gallery, York Hall, for
the purpose of conducting a joint meeting with York County’s legislative
delegation.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Shepperd, Zaremba,
Noll, Burgett, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
_____________________________________
______________________________________
James O. McReynolds, Clerk
Donald E. Wiggins, Chairman
York County Board of Supervisors
York County Board of Supervisors |