|
Regular Meeting
March 5, 2002
7:00 p.m.
Meeting Convened. A Regular Meeting of the York County Board of
Supervisors was called to order at 7:02 p.m., Tuesday, March 5, 2002, in
the Board Room, York Hall, by Chairman Donald E. Wiggins.
Attendance. The following members of the Board of Supervisors were
present: Walter C. Zaremba, Sheila S. Noll, Donald E. Wiggins, James S.
Burgett, and Thomas G. Shepperd.
Also in attendance were James O. McReynolds, County Administrator;
and James E. Barnett, County Attorney.
Invocation. Miss Tara Smiddy, York County Youth Commission, gave the
Invocation.
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
Vice Chairman Zaremba led the Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENTATIONS
YORK COUNTY YOUTH COMMISSION
Mr. Ryan Touhill, Chairman of the York County Youth Commission, made
the Commission's third quarterly report to the Board of Supervisors. He
reviewed for the Board the events the Commission had been involved in
since December, including the Yorktown Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony,
an Adopt-A-Highway project, a County-wide ski trip at Wintergreen, a
County-wide middle school dance, and the Senior Center Valentine Day
Party. Upcoming events of the Commission include: the Zweibrücken
Student Exchange Program, another Adopt-A-Highway project, and the Right
Choices for Youth Program Forum. Mr. Touhill also welcomed Mr. Burgett
back as the Commission's Board Liaison.
Mrs. Noll expressed interest in the Right Choices for Youth Program
and asked Mr. Touhill to explain the program for the Board.
Chairman Wiggins expressed the Board's pride in the job the Youth
Commissioners are doing for the County.
PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2003 OPERATING BUDGET
Mr. James O. McReynolds, County Administrator, presented to the Board
of Supervisors the proposed FY2003 Budget, and he reviewed the General
Fund budget issues impacting the budget which included:
No tax rate increase
School funding
Employee compensation
State funding
He discussed projected General Fund revenues by source which
indicates a $5.2 million or 7.2 percent increase over FY2002, which can
be attributed to growth in the property tax base. The population is
expected to grow by about 1.3 with 60,400 people residing in York County
in July of 2003. This lower population growth is the result of the steps
taken by the Board to manage growth through changes in the zoning
densities that will lower the County's ultimate population to
approximately 80,000. A small increase in the student population is
expected over the projected FY2002 figure, going from 11,810 to 11,960
in FY2003. During calendar year 2001, 554 new housing units were
completed in the County, and construction is expected to continue at a
slightly slower pace during 2002. Education is by far the largest single
expenditure and priority in the General Fund taking 46 percent of its
total. The School Board was initially told it could expect an increase
of $1.7 million in the local contribution for education, but it was now
being recommended that an additional $170,000 be provided to support the
School Division. Mr. McReynolds then reviewed the decline in state and
federal funding and the increase in local funding for the school system
over the past years. He then reviewed the 10.25 new positions being
recommended as well as recommended compensation cost increases due to
step adjustments and a 2.75 percent market adjustment. He briefly
reviewed the non-personnel increases amounting to $1,391,000, and noted
he was also recommending that the contingency reserve be increased by
$224,000. In summary, Mr. McReynolds stated that over the past years,
population growth, additional school and other programs, declining
federal and state support, and program cost shifting have greatly raised
the demand on County resources, although the proposed budget maintains
tax rates at their current levels
Mr. Burgett asked if the 46 percent figure for the School Division
included capital costs.
Mr. McReynolds indicated it included County funding for school
operations and capital debt.
Mr. Zaremba asked what other organizations/agencies receive a large
part of their budgets through the state as well as the County.
Mr. McReynolds cited the Colonial Services Board, the York-Poquoson
Department of Social Services, the Health Department, and certain
regional efforts such as the regional jail and the Merrimac Center.
Mr. Zaremba noted that because the General Assembly had not yet made
its final decisions on the state budget, there was the possibility that
these agencies might possibly be looking to the County to make up for
any state shortfalls.
Mr. McReynolds recommended that, if that were to happen, the Board
only fund that which is mandated because the County would be required to
fund that additional amount in the future.
Mr. Zaremba asked Mr. McReynolds to provide the Board with a tutorial
on what is and what is not mandated so that the Board can make those
decisions in an informed manner.
Mr. McReynolds indicated that by the Board's next work session the
staff may not know the final outcome of the General Assembly and the
Governor's actions with regard to the budget, but staff will keep the
Board informed.
CITIZENS COMMENT PERIOD
Mr. and Mrs. Steve Dodson, 48 Main Street, Newport News, appeared to
appeal to the Board of Supervisors to allow them to pay the originally
offered water connection fee of $2,850 for property they own at 411 Ilex
Drive in Yorktown. They indicated Mrs. Dodson's mother had previously
owned the property prior to going into a nursing home, and they
purchased the property from her and did not know she had not acted on
the County's letters that went out when the project was first advertised
for the reduced fee.
Mr. Joseph Haggerty, 403 Timberline Loop, presented the Board with a
petition containing the signatures of 84 percent of the current
residents of Rainbrook Villas concerning a safety problem on Route 17 at
Grafton Drive. He indicated the residents have to make a U-turn in order
to enter Rainbrook, and he had been told there had already been one
accident. Mr. Haggerty stated the petition asks the County to request
VDOT to continue on its current schedule for the Burt's Road project
which will help alleviate the subject safety problem.
COUNTY ATTORNEY REPORTS AND REQUESTS
Mr. Barnett reported on the status of the following legislation
currently under consideration by the General Assembly:
House Bill 477 Requires mailing of notices
to all property owners where density is affected. The Senate version
requires notification to all property owners immediately affected that
would decrease dwelling unit density.
House Bill 1299 Would allow a replacement
manufactured home, even though the original one was a non-conforming
use, if the original is destroyed for any reason.
Mr. Barnett then indicated his office recently participated in a
legal issues seminar sponsored by the Human Resources Division.
Assistant County Attorney Carla Hook spoke on employee privacy, and Mr.
Barnett spoke on sovereign immunity. He also noted that by the time of
the next Regular Meeting, staff should have heard from the Justice
Department on the County's redistricting application.
Mr. Zaremba indicated that back in November the Board submitted its
legislative package to the County's representatives in the General
Assembly. He asked if staff had heard any status reports on the Board's
legislative requests.
Mr. Barnett stated the only one he knew about was the annexation
legislation which passed both houses unanimously. He also noted that the
photo-monitoring bill died an early death. He stated he would provide
the Board with a final report on the County's legislative package at the
next meeting.
Chairman Wiggins asked if anyone knew the status of the 1 percent tax
increase bill for transportation and schools.
Mr. McReynolds stated he had talked to Delegate Rapp this afternoon
who stated the bill has gone to the Governor, but he has some questions.
Based on Miss Rapp's comments, he stated the Governor planned on signing
the bill in some form.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS AND REQUESTS
Mr. McReynolds reminded the Board of its March 12 work session on the
proposed FY03 budget. He stated staff would present to the Board more
documentation on the proposed budget to help the Board members prepare
for their deliberations. He asked the Board members to provide staff at
that time with the budget areas or topics they wish staff to cover
during the following work sessions. Mr. McReynolds noted that the public
hearings on the proposed budget and tax rates would be held on March 14
at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of York Hall.
MATTERS PRESENTED BY THE BOARD
Mr. Shepperd reminded the citizens of District 5 about his town
meeting to be held at Tabb Elementary School on March 7. He stated staff
has helped him prepare some very short presentations on several topics,
and there will be a period for discussion on each item. There will also
be a very interesting series of slides reflecting reports of the
Sheriff's Department.
Meeting Recessed. At 7:52 p.m. Chairman Wiggins declared a short
recess.
Meeting Reconvened. At 8:01 p.m. the meeting was reconvened in open
session by order of the Chair.
PUBLIC HEARING
SALE OF BETHEL TOWN HALL PROPERTY
Mr. McReynolds made a presentation on proposed Resolution R02-40 to
authorize the execution of an agreement for the sale of County property
located at 1606 Yorktown Road, known as Bethel Town Hall. He noted the
property had been surplus for an extended period, and both adjacent
property owners were contacted to determine if either one wished to
acquire the property. One of the adjacent property owners wishes to
purchase the property to incorporate it into his existing parcel, and
staff recommends selling the property for $15,000 which would be the
increased assessed value of the purchaser's property with the additional
property. He noted that standing alone the property was a non-conforming
lot that was much smaller in relation to required minimum 1-acre lot
sizes in the surrounding neighborhood.
Mr. Burgett asked where the contract was and who set the sales price
discounting the property by 40 percent. He stated it is a saleable lot
and should not be discounted.
Mr. McReynolds indicated staff would make the contract available to
the Board. With regard to the assessment, he noted that until the Board
votes on the sale of the property, no price reduction has taken place
with regard to the assessment. He stated the staff's logic for
recommending a lower-than-assessed value sales price is based on the
fact that if this property were combined with the purchaser's, it would
no longer be a separate buildable lot, and the assessment on the
combined lots has a less worth. If the lot remains as it, then the
assessment would remain at $24,900.
Mr. Burgett asked why the staff did not advertise the proposed sale
to the public, giving everyone an opportunity.
Mr. McReynolds stated that in this particular instance staff felt it
was more advantageous to combine the non-conforming parcel, which had a
number of drawbacks, with one of the adjacent properties. He stated that
normally the staff would advertise the sale of surplus property
publicly.
Mr. Burgett questioned if this was going to be staff's normal
procedure in the future for selling County real estate. He stated he did
not recall seeing any proposal for the sale of the subject property.
Mr. McReynolds stated he would not typically recommend this procedure
for other properties that do not have the same constraints as the
subject property.
Mr. Burgett stated he felt this matter was brought to the Board after
the fact, and he would like to know of these matters before the fact in
the future. He stated these types of matters are generally discussed in
Closed Meeting. He then asked why the County was not properly
maintaining the building that is situated on the subject property.
Mr. McReynolds indicated the staff has been maintaining the building,
although at a minimal level since it is not being used.
Mrs. Noll asked if the building would remain on the property if the
property were purchased by the adjacent property owner.
Mr. McReynolds stated it was his understanding that it would remain
on the property to be used for storage or a guest house.
Mrs. Noll indicated she would feel more comfortable if the agreement
could be structured so that the purchaser could not use the building for
an accessory apartment. She acknowledged that this was tax-free
property, and selling it would put it back on the tax rolls.
Mr. McReynolds stated the owner would have to get a use permit
approved by the Board of Supervisors in order to use the building as a
guest house.
Mr. Shepperd asked if there were any numbers on how much parking
space the property could have.
Mr. McReynolds stated staff had not had an opportunity to look into
that aspect.
Mr. Shepperd stated he felt Mr. Burgett had a lot of good points on
the sale of the property, as well as Mrs. Noll's comments on what could
be done with the building. He indicated the building needs some paint,
and it could be used, although there is probably a parking problem. It
will cost the County some money for maintenance, but he stated he is
opposed to selling any County property unless there is a very compelling
reason.
Mr. Zaremba asked Mr. McReynolds what he meant when he said the
property was non-conforming.
Mr. McReynolds stated the Rural Residential zoning requires a minimum
lot size of one acre if water and sewer are available, and they are.
This parcel is less than .2 acre.
Mr. Zaremba stated that with the County's ownership of the property
there is no change of anyone building a home. If the County sells the
property to the adjacent landowner, the adjacent landowner has agreed to
remove the lot lines between the properties making one parcel. He asked
what would be the opportunity in the future for the landowner to ask for
a variance to build something on the property.
Mr. McReynolds stated the property owner could go to the Board of
Zoning/Subdivision Appeals and ask for a variance at any point in time.
Mr. J. Mark Carter, Planning and Zoning Manager, stated the two
properties together would not be wide enough to re-subdivide, but the
owner could always ask for a variance.
Discussion followed on the possibility of the use of a flag lot and
the cost of maintenance on the 700 square foot building currently
located on the subject property.
Chairman Wiggins stated he would not like to see the property sold as
a separate lot because he feels a judge would allow a house to be built
on it. He stated it was not going to be of any use to the County, and he
did not want to see a non-conforming house being built on the property.
Chairman Wiggins then called to order a public hearing on proposed
Resolution R02-40 which was duly advertised as required by law and is
entitled:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE
AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL
ESTATE OWNED BY THE COUNTY LOCATED AT 1606 YORKTOWN ROAD
There being no one present who wished to speak concerning the subject
resolution, Chairman Wiggins closed the public hearing.
Mr. Burgett stated there are numerous planned subdivisions in York
County where the lots are even smaller than .2 acres. He indicated there
is constant talk about the availability of housing for young people in
York County, and this would be a wonderful lot for a starter home for a
young family. Mr. Burgett stated the Board should try to maximize this
one little non-conforming lot by selling it to someone who could do
something with it. He stated he feels strongly about not discounting
this property, and he asked the Board to defeat the resolution.
Mrs. Noll suggested that the Board table this matter and advertise
the property for sale to the public for a limited length of time. If the
property does not sell, then the alternative could be to allow staff to
continue the contract with the adjacent property owner for the sale.
Mr. Burgett indicated he felt Mrs. Noll's suggestion was fair and
that a month would be a reasonable period of time.
Chairman Wiggins stated he felt as strongly as Mr. Burgett but in the
opposite direction. He stated he did not feel the County should sell a
.2-acre parcel with a 700 square foot building as a lot that a house
could be put on in a district that has a minimum of 1-acre lots. He
stated he would rather see the County keep the property.
Mr. Shepperd stated he did not want the County to sell the property
at all. He stated if the building on the property is a problem to
maintain, it could be torn down. He suggested that in the future the
property might be used for some public purpose.
Mr. Zaremba stated he did not feel the Board was ready to make a
decision on whether or not to sell this property, and more staff work
was needed. He then moved that the Board table consideration of proposed
Resolution R02-40.
On roll call, the vote was:
Yea: (5) Zaremba, Noll, Burgett, Shepperd, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
MATTERS PRESENTED BY THE BOARD (Continued)
Mr. Burgett commended the York County Youth Commission for the work
it is doing and for its involvement in certain activities. He noted that
five of the Commissioners participated in a Model United Nations Day,
and all of them received awards, with James Noel taking "Best
Delegate." Mr. Burgett stated he would be the Honorary Chairman for
the Right Choices for Youth program, and he reminded everyone that
Friday was the deadline for submitting nominations for the Outstanding
Youth of the Year Awards program. He then stated he would like the
County to start an initiative for Route 17 beautification with the
citizens and businesses. He spoke of the many derelict buildings and
areas along Route 17 that are eyesores, stating he was interested in
getting the citizens and business owners together to determine how
something can be done to spruce up Route 17. He stated he felt it would
be a worthy project for the community.
Mrs. Noll spoke about the synchronization of traffic lights on Route
17, commending VDOT for the recent work done on them. She also spoke
about the need for transportation projects in the Hampton Roads region
in order for the region to thrive in the future. She stated Senator
Marty Williams should be given a great deal of credit for having the
courage to propose the legislation for the transportation referendum.
She indicated a lot of study has gone into the six proposed
transportation projects over the past five years, and they are crucial
for the region's tourism industry.
Mr. Zaremba spoke of the Neighborhoods Conference that took place two
weeks ago at Lafayette High School in James City County. He stated it
was the sixth time the conference was held, and it brought together
citizens to learn about the many component parts that make up the three
participating localities. He stated the conference was well attended,
and he asked everyone to put it on their calendars for next year. Mr.
Zaremba then addressed this year's legislative process, and he suggested
that there be some follow-up done to close the loop on the 12 specific
legislative requests the Board submitted to the General Assembly. He
stated the Board needs to get with the County's delegation to talk about
what the Board and County staff can do better next year. Mr. Zaremba
also suggested that the Board do the same thing in looking at the budget
process to determine how to improve that process for next year. He spoke
about the potential shortfalls coming from Richmond and how the Board
would deal with them.
Chairman Wiggins noted there was a lot of controversy about
Williamsburg Community Hospital moving to York County, and the press has
insinuated there is a lot of animosity between York County and
Williamsburg over this issue. He noted he had lunch with Williamsburg's
Mayor Zeidler, and although she is not happy about the move, she and the
city hold no animosity. He stated York County had the property that the
hospital wanted. Chairman Wiggins then spoke of the informational
hearing VDOT held at York High School on the Route 17 widening project,
stating the people who go to these public meetings expect to be able to
be heard and feel that their comments will be taken into consideration.
He stated this wasn't the case, that the project had already been
approved and would be moving forward, and he did not see a need to hold
these meetings. He noted that there would be another such meeting on the
extension of Fort Eustis Boulevard into Seaford the next night. A great
deal of the engineering work has been done on the project, and the
project will go forward.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mr. Shepperd asked that Item Nos. 3 and 4 be removed from the Consent
Calendar.
Mr. Burgett moved that the Consent Calendar be approved as amended,
Item Nos. 2 and 5, respectively.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Noll, Burgett, Shepperd, Zaremba, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
Thereupon, the following minutes were approved and resolutions
adopted:
Item No. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The following minutes of the York County Board of Supervisors were
approved:
February 5, 2002, Regular Meeting
February 12, 2002, Adjourned Meeting
Item No. 5. REIMBURSEMENT FOR FINANCIAL LOSS: Resolution R02-41.
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE REIMBURSEMENT OF FINANCIAL LOSS DUE TO
KILLING OF LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY BY DOGS
WHEREAS, York County maintains in Fund 10 - GENERAL FUND monies
appropriated for the reimbursement of persons suffering financial loss
because of the killing of livestock or poultry by dogs; and
WHEREAS, John Combs certified that he has sustained the loss of four
chickens by dogs owned by person(s) unknown, and has claimed a total of
$27.80, which is reimbursable pursuant to the requirements of Section
3.1-796.118, Code of Virginia;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the York County Board of
Supervisors this the 5th day of March, 2002, that the County
Administrator be and he hereby is authorized to reimburse Mr. Combs in
the amount of $27.80 for his claim pursuant to Section 3.1-796.118, Code
of Virginia.
Item No. 3. PURCHASE AUTHORIZATION: Proposed Resolution R02-43
(Removed from Consent Calendar)
Mr. Shepperd asked if the cost of the third year of the landscaping
contract had gone up.
Mr. Carter indicated the cost for the third year was the same as the
first and second. He addressed the investment the County has in the
plantings, and stated the funds were for maintenance on the plants.
Mr. Shepperd asked if the County does the mowing.
Mr. Carter stated the Regional Jail inmates mow the Route 17 corridor
as much as possible, but it depends on their availability.
Mr. Zaremba asked what last year's audit contract price was.
Mr. McReynolds stated he thought it was about 3 percent less than
this year's price.
Mrs. Marycarol White, Director of Financial and Management Services,
indicated that last year's contract was approximately $47,250.
Mr. Zaremba asked if the landscaping contract had a watering
provision.
Mr. Carter indicated it did.
Mr. Shepperd then moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-43
that reads:
A RESOLUTION TO RENEW THE AUDIT SERVICES CONTRACT FOR A SECOND YEAR,
AND TO RENEW THE LANDSCAPING SERVICES CONTRACT FOR A THIRD YEAR
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the Board of Supervisors that all
procurements of goods and services by the County involving the
expenditure of $30,000 or more be submitted to the Board for its review
and approval; and
WHEREAS, the County Administrator has determined that the following
procurements are necessary and desirable, that they involve the
expenditure of $30,000 or more, and that all applicable laws,
ordinances, and regulations have been complied with;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the York County Board of
Supervisors this the 5th day of March, 2002, that the County
Administrator be, and hereby is, authorized to execute procurement
arrangements for the following two procurements:
AMOUNT
Audit Services (Renewal) $ 49,150
Landscaping Services (Renewal) 34,800
On roll call, the vote was:
Yea: (5) Burgett, Shepperd, Zaremba, Noll, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
Item No. 4. TELEPHONIC AUTOMATED INSPECTION REQUEST AND PLAN REVIEW
INFORMATION SYSTEM: Proposed Resolution R02-52 (Removed from Consent
Calendar)
Mr. Shepperd asked why the staff was surprised by the need for this
procurement.
Mr. John Hudgins, Director of Environmental and Development Services,
stated the County had a software vendor who decided not to support the
software any more and go out of business with that particular product.
Staff had no anticipation of this action at this time and was surprised
by the notice.
Mr. Shepperd asked how long it will take to get a new system in
place.
Mr. Hudgins stated staff will have the critical elements in place
this month.
Discussion followed regarding future vendor agreements containing
clauses to provide the County with more notice before an agreement
termination can take place. The Board also discussed staff providing a
more thorough review when selecting a new vendor.
Mr. Shepperd then moved the adoption of proposed Resolution R02-52
that reads:
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE EXECUTION OF TWO CONTRACTS WITH FRANKS
SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AUTOMATED INSPECTION REQUEST AND PLAN REVIEW
INFORMATION SYSTEM AND TO PURCHASE WEB INTEGRATION SOFTWARE
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the Board of Supervisors that all
procurements of goods and services by the County involving the
expenditure of $30,000 or more be submitted to the Board for its review
and approval; and
WHEREAS, the County Administrator has determined that the following
procurement is necessary and desirable, that it involves the expenditure
of $30,000 or more, and that all applicable laws, ordinances, and
regulations have been complied with;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the York County Board of
Supervisors this the 5th day of March, 2002, that the County
Administrator be, and hereby is, authorized to conclude procurement
arrangements with Frank Solutions, Inc., for the replacement of the
Automated Inspection Request and Plan Review Information System.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator be, and hereby
is, authorized to conclude procurement arrangements with Franks
Solutions, Inc., effective July 1, 2002, for Web Interface Software.
AMOUNT
Automated Inspection Request and Plan
Review $ 65,260
Information System Replacement
Web Interface
Software
$ 31,200
On roll call, the vote was:
Yea: (5) Shepperd, Zaremba, Noll, Burgett, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
NEW BUSINESS
MINOR MODIFICATION-APPLICATION NO. UP-573-01, STOR MOORE FACILITY,
WOLFTRAP ROAD
The request for a minor modification to the special use permit
approval granted by Resolution R01-65(R) for a mini-warehouse facility
located on the south side of Wolftrap Road was removed from the agenda
at the request of the applicant.
CLOSED MEETING. At 9:12 p.m. Mr. Zaremba moved that the meeting be
convened in Closed Meeting pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(a)(3) of the
Code of Virginia pertaining to the acquisition of real property for a
public purpose.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Zaremba, Noll, Burgett, Shepperd, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
Meeting Reconvened. At 9:27 p.m. the meeting was reconvened in open
session by order of the Chair.
Mrs. Noll moved the adoption of proposed Resolution SR-1 that reads:
A RESOLUTION TO CERTIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACT REGARDING MEETING IN CLOSED MEETING
WHEREAS, the York County Board of Supervisors has convened a closed
meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in
accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information
Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3711.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a
certification by the York County Board of Supervisors that such closed
meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the York County Board of
Supervisors this the 5th day of March, 2002, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each member's knowledge, (1) only public business matters
lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were
discussed in the closed meeting to which this certification resolution
applies, and (2) only such public business matters as were identified in
the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed, or
considered by the York County Board of Supervisors.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Noll, Burgett, Shepperd, Zaremba, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
A brief discussion ensued concerning the County's involvement in the
Historical Committee's museum and the 4th of July Celebration.
Meeting Adjourned. At 9:40 p.m. Mr. Burgett moved that the meeting be
adjourned to 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 12, 2002, in the East Room, York
Hall, for the purpose of conducting a work session.
On roll call the vote was:
Yea: (5) Burgett, Shepperd, Zaremba, Noll, Wiggins
Nay: (0)
____________________________________
______________________________________
James O. McReynolds,
Clerk
Donald E. Wiggins, Chairman
York County Board of
Supervisors
York County Board of Supervisors
Back to Index
|
